Sims 4 Pool Slide Cc, Articles D

And it is that, in my opinion, of which she must make counter restitution. Commercial Lenders Law - LawTeacher.net Arguably the author Chandler makes a good point on this case; that it is the potential liability under the all-moneys clause that should matter, as it could technically be enforced. In the circumstances the charge would be set aside as against the wife if she paid to the bank one half of the 210,000 loaned for the lease plus interest. The plaintiff in the action was Bank of Credit and Commerce International Societe Anonyme ("the Bank"). 200569944 LAW 3320 - Long Dissertation 13200 words Abstract This thesis revolves around the issues of whether the interest of those occupying in the family home has been afforded a greater protection following the coming into force of the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA). criticise Mr Nadeems conduct as unconscionable. She had no need to make counter restitution because, having set aside the Legal Charge, she cannot assert a. beneficial interest in the property in priority to the Banks legal charge to secure repayment of the money with which the property was acquired. Dunbar Bank Plc v Nadeem and Another: ChD 13 Nov 1996 The Wife does not contend that that charge is also liable to be set aside against her. The byproduct of which, as we are currently feeling due to the present lending crisis, would be an inescapable slow down of the economy. The negotiations had been conducted solely between the husband and the bank. He approached the Bank to provide the finance for the acquisition of the new lease. It was in fact some 560,000, but the Judge found that this may not have been known to the Bank until after the completion of its own security. The husband's financial position continued to deteriorate. 6.7 Undue influence - Svantesson on the Law of Obligations It is not contended that Mrs Nadeem could successfully challenge the National Westminster's legal charge. Dunbar Bank plc v. Nadeem [1998] 3 All E.R. To not do so would result in financial uncertainty to the detriment of society as a whole, which in turn would result in the grave failure of the English economy, causing unprecedented chaos in Courts across the breadth of the English legal system. One consequence of the charge on the Wifes beneficial interest being voidable, as, opposed to void, is that the subsequent charge, when made, was, effective in respect of her beneficial interest. 629; (1999) 31 H.L.R. In many cases the transaction can be analysed either as a transaction between the husband and wife, which is set aside as against the husband and through him as against the bank, or as a transaction between the wife and the bank which can be set aside directly as against the bank. On the facts there was found to be no undue influence so the mortgage was binding in its entirety. recognised judicially, most notably in Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v Burch,11 where Nourse L J accepted that the legal charge in favour of the bank could have been set aside as an unconscionable bargain (as opposed to . Undue influence claims: What remedies? National Commercial Bank (Jamaica) Ltd. v Hew [2003] UKPC 51, holding (at [91]) that there was a need for unconscionable conduct, abuse of influence and unfair exploitation of the influence over the vulnerable party. Secondly, there was the agreement between Mr and Mrs Nadeem and the Bank on terms of the facility letter. swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. The Bank concedes that the transaction was speculative and may have been imprudent, but it contends that it was not manifestly disadvantageous to Mrs Nadeem. The wife had acquired with the bank's money a joint interest in the lease but had not had to contribute to the cost of its acquisition. Decision of Robert Englehart QC. 1500 word description. 3. All negotiations were conducted between Mr Nadeem and the Bank. Equitys view of equality flows from the fact that to treat women any differently or preferentially would be, as Graham Battersby states; unacceptably patronizing and wholly inconsistent with modern notions of the status of women. TSB Bank plc v Camfield - Case Law - VLEX 849727090 All the accounts were repayable on demand. Duress, Undue Influence, And Illegality Super Review - Cram.com However, such a criticism has not prevented the Courts from finding in favour of the banks. The first provision asks for the transaction to be explained in full, secondly the lender must ask who is acting on the suretys behalf (name of solicitor), then finally the lender is required to seek confirmation from the solicitor that the surety has been advised about the nature and risks contained within the transaction. Mortgages - general and undue influence Flashcards | Quizlet It was in fact some 560,000, but the Judge found that this may not have been known to the Bank until after the completion of its own security. DUNBAR - Makers of Contemporary Furnishings She did not read the letter before signing and, if she had read it, she would not have understood it. By the first agreement Mrs Nadeem obtained a half interest in the equity of redemption subject to the Banks legal charge, and by the second she obtained jointly. But I need not decide this question because of the Judges clear finding that Mr Nadeem did not take unfair advantage of his position. In Dunbar Bank Plc v. Nadeem [1998] the bank incorrectly used an "all-moneys form" instead of a limited one. Disclaimer: This essay has been written by a law student and not by our expert law writers. Actual UI is influence expressly used by the defendant for a purpose, while the more common presumed UI is influence presumed to exist on the basis of the relationship between the parties. Mrs Nadeem submits that the imposition of terms is wrong in principle and contrary to the decision of this Court in, had been willing to execute the charge to that extent. This purported to make each of the mortgagors jointly and severally liable for all moneys and liabilities owed by either of them on any account. She concludes that the UI test is manifestly unsuitable to protect women as equity appears more concerned with shielding the business interests of major commercial lenders. In Barclays Bank v. Khaira the bank employee failed to obtain Mrs Khairas signature to the loan or witness it. Auchmuty alleges that by moving the focus of the law from any wrong at hand to the method in which commercial lenders can avoid being affected, is evidently prejudicial against women. At most, she would have understood that the document was something to do with the house.". Equity can only help if restitutio in integrum could be achieved. In my judgment, therefore, the Legal Charge would be to eliminate any personal liability on the part of Mrs Nadeem. The total indebtedness on these accounts at the end of 1990 was approximately 1.267m and interest was payable at a rate of some 50,000 a quarter. The circumstances were such as to put the bank on inquiry and, it not having taken any steps to ascertain whether the wife truly appreciated what she was doing, there was constructive notice of undue influence. Accordingly, I would not have been persuaded by the existence of the second legal charge in favour of the National Westminster Bank to hold that counter-restitutiion was impossible. Consequently, the wife was rendering herself liable, and giving her interest in the matrimonial home as security, not only for her joint debts with the husband but also for debts in excess of 1.25m which the husband owed the bank. National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686; [1985] 2 WLR 588; [1985] 1 All ER 821. "Although Mrs Nadeem did sign the letter, I have no doubt having heard and observed her giving evidence before me that she merely signed because her husband asked her to do so. As discussed above, commercial law requires a black and white system which allows commercial lenders the maximum amount of certainty in their financial dealings, obviously the introduction of grey areas would make it difficult for them to plan financially. As Fehlberg states judges oversimplify to a large degree the emotional and economic reasons why women provide security. Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem [1998] 3 All ER 876 - Law Journals There could be no setting aside unless the wife accounted to the bank for the benefit she had accrued from the use of its money. CALL DUNBAR. Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem; [1998] 3 FCR 629. Additionally, the Court looked at the role played by commercial lenders and lawyers in such transactions. Contract Law - Undue Influence - What is the difference - Studocu Dunbar Bank Plc v Nadeem and Another: CA 1 Jul 1998 6. 20 See, eg, R Bigwood "Undue Influence: . Phone. It is, in my view, plain that the Wife cannot retain the beneficial interest in the lease if she is to escape from liability under the facility letter and legal charge. She was happy to leave anything of a financial nature entirely to her husband, and relied implicitly in him and would unquestioningly do whatever he asked her. Family Court Reports. Premium. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. To avoid this injustice she must make restitutio in integrum by repaying to the Bank 105,00, being one half of the money advanced by the Bank for the acquisition of the property with simple interest at an ordinary commercial rate. The explanation which Mr Nadeem gave in evidence was that he thought that his wife should have an interest in the property as he himself was "getting on". Even if the Legal Charge were set aside, she would be unable to assert any beneficial interest in the property in priority to the Banks Legal Charge. In this event also the Wife would have no defence to the claim for possession. (4) The bank had constructive notice of the defect in the transaction and, accordingly, Mrs Nadeem was, prima facie, entitled to have the legal charge set aside as between her and the Bank. Cited Halpern and Another v Halpern and others ComC 4-Jul-2006 The court considered whether a party can avoid a contract procured by duress in circumstances where he cannot offer the other party substantial restitutio in integrum. The Bank was willing to agree in principle to advance 260,000 on the security of the new lease, of which 210,000 would be used to acquire the lease and 50,000 to "regularise" the four existing accounts. The explanation which Mr Nadeem gave in evidence was that he thought that his wife should have an interest in the property as he himself was getting on. At the beginning of 1991 Mr Nadeem was in arrears to the Bank for approximately 32,000 in respect of the interest payable in September 1990 and was unable to pay the 52,000 interest which had fallen due in December 1990. Lamare v Dixon (1873) LR 6 HL 414. if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3','ezslot_4',125,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3-0'); Times 01-Jul-1998, [1998] EWCA Civ 1027, [1998] 3 All ER 876, [1998] 2 FLR 457, [1998] 3 FCR 629, (1999) 31 HLR 402, [1998] Fam Law 595if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4','ezslot_7',113,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4-0'); Cited Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Aboody CA 1989 In a case where the defendant said that a mortgage had been signed from undue pressure the court may find actual undue influence as opposed to presumed undue influence. This Webcam is operated by: Magyver of the Yuba River - Visit Source. The leasehold was due to expire at the end of 1996. 876, with Millett L.J.'s cautious words at p. 884, "Whether that case was rightly decided or not, it was a very different case.". "The security for the loan will consist of a first legal charge over a [new] lease . liable to be set aside as against both the Husband and the Bank. $1,399. He approached the Bank to provide the finance for the acquisition of the new lease. Published: 7th Aug 2019. But however the present case is, analysed, whether as a case of actual or presumed influence, the, influence was not undue. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Accordingly, in my judgment, the extent of Mr Nadeems enrichment, should the Legal Charge be set aside, is not the money which was. Thus, in Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem [1998] 3 All ER 876, at p 886, Morritt LJ said: Download. In these circumstances it seems to me that the right or advantage acquired by the Wife which she was bound to restore as a condition of rescission was the beneficial interest in the lease granted by the landlord and not a proportion of the debt secured by the legal charge. The negotiations continued to be conducted by Mr Nadeem alone. Ethnic traditionalism did not dismember public policy considerations in Dunbar Bank PLC v Nadeem in the UK court of appeal where the culturally accepted passivity of the wife needed no proof of the overt evidence of actual undue influence. This purported to make each of the mortgagors jointly and severally liable for all moneys and liabilities owed by either of them on any account. In the meantime, however, he had been offered the opportunity to acquire a longer lease of the property in place of his existing lease for a sum of 210,000. also agree with the analysis by Lord Justice Morritt of what, in reality, constituted the transaction to be set aside in this action for the purposes of deciding what right or advantage the Wife was bound to restore as a condition of setting aside the charge. (855) 538-6227. Moreover, the Judge did to my mind find more than a relationship in which Mrs Nadeem was content to leave it to Mr Nadeem to make decisions in financial matters because she trusted him. Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found. UI amounts to some form of conduct that is capable of influencing or clouding the judgement of another so they can no longer be validly said to consent to that which they sign. Edited by: The Rt Hon Sir Mathew Thorpe Publisher: Bloomsbury Professional. The consequence is that the remedy of rescission is not now available to her. By its cross-appeal the Bank contends that Mrs Nadeem has not established a case for having the Legal Charge set aside. Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem - legalmax.info She was obtaining for the first time a beneficial joint interest in an equity of redemption in the property having an estimated value of 140,000. He had four loan accounts with the Bank in respect of which the Bank held a number of various properties as security. Only full case reports are accepted in court. By its cross-appeal the Bank contends that Mrs Nadeem has not established a case for having the Legal Charge set aside. Accordingly, the banks cross-appeal would be allowed and the wifes appeal dismissed. Dunbar Bank plc v Nadeem In cases of presumed undue influence, C must also establish that the transaction was to his disadvantage RBS v Etridge (No 2) Etridge protocols intoduced and O'Brien delineation doubted TSB Bank plc v Camfield - whole mortgage set aside Barclays Bank plc v Caplan However, this is not to say that the present case is, in terms of either its facts or the issues to be decided, on all fours with previously decided cases. Edmunds v Coleman (Inspector of Taxes): ChD 19 Nov 1997 The authority of Dunbar Bank v Nadeem, Ch D at, per DixonJ; Goldsworthy vBrickell, n 24 above, 401 per Nourse LJ, cited with approval by Robert EnglehartQC in Dunbar Bank plc vNadeem, Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s 1(3), Harriet Dailey Appellant v Franklyn Dailey Respondent, Bank Of China (Hong Kong) Ltd v Well Lok Printing Ltd And Others, Undue Influence in the House of Lords: Principles and Proof, The Modern Law Review Nbr. For the surrender of the remainder of his existing lease, therefore, Mr Nadeem was in a position to acquire an extended lease of his matrimonial home at a price which was roughly 190,000 less than its estimated value. In particular, the transaction with which I am concerned cannot be neatly categorized as a pure surety case such as O'Brien or as an ordinary case of joint borrowing for joint purposes as in Pitt. As a class, 2 case, and it is not disputed, it is necessary for the Wife to demonstrate that the impugned transaction was to her manifest disadvantage. Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case. In this action the plaintiff bank, Dunbar Bank plc ("the bank"), seeks to enforce as against both defendants a charge by way of legal mortgage dated 9 May 1991 over their joint leasehold interest in a house at 152 Pavilion Road, London SW1. This purported to make each of the mortgagors jointly and severally liable for all moneys and liabilities owed by either of them on any account. Mr Nadeem had also borrowed heavily from other sources, and he was indebted to other banks including National Westminster Bank. By her appeal Mrs Nadeem contends that the Judge should have made an order setting aside the Legal Charge as between herself and the Bank without imposing any conditions. Mr and Mrs Nadeem defaulted. Alleghany's subsidiary Alleghany Capital Corporation owns and supports a diverse portfolio of eight non-financial businesses. See. In my judgment it is not necessary to reach a conclusion on this question, since I am satisfied that the Judge was wrong to take the Legal Charge at face value. Voluntary manslaughter is pleaded as a special and partial defence to murder. I doubt very much whether her husband gave her any explanation at all about the matter. This is the judgment of the court, to which all its members have contributed, on an appeal by Mrs. Doris Aboody from part of a judgment of Sir Joseph Cantley (sitting as an additional judge of the High Court), given on 30th September 1987. National Westminster Bank Plc contracted for a second charge. The facts are set out in the opinion of Millett LJ. In light of this, a womans decision cannot always be considered self-interested and/or an independent choice. Mr Nadeem formerly occupied the property under a lease for a term of 13 3/4 years from 25th March 1983 granted by the Cadogan Estate. Britannia Building Societyv Pugh [1997] 2 FLR 7 at p. The result would be that the Bank would then enjoy a legal charge over the whole of the beneficial interest in the lease as security for the whole of the liability. D8; Times, July 1, 1998 The matrimonial home was a house acquired on a leasehold in the husband's sole name. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. (1) Mrs Nadeem had established a relationship of trust and confidence in her husband. In my judgment, however, there was no need to impose conditions on the setting aside of the Legal Charge in order to achieve counter restitution. As such groups are reportedly reluctant to come out to strangers, potentially lenders may protest at a lack of notice. The wife defended the action asserting that her apparent assent was vitiated by the transaction having been procured by undue influence on the part of the husband. Kings North Trust Ltd v Bell [1986] 1 WLR 119. Dunbar Bank v Nadeem United Kingdom Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 18 juni 1998 .presumed undue influence of the type referred to as class 2 in the categorisation of such cases made by Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Barclays Bank Plc v O'Brien [1994] AC 180, 189. In the present case the relationship between the husband and the wife was one in which she had total faith in him as far as financial matters were concerned and this satisfied the first element necessary for a case in presumed undue influence to be made out. It would, in my view, be unjust if it should now obtain priority over Dunbar Bank in respect of the Wifes interest in the lease. Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more. Matrimonial home held on lease in sole name of husband new lease purchased and wife made joint tenant bank loaning purchase money subject to charge on property court setting aside transaction as between bank and wife whether wife entitled to benefit from consequence as her interest acquired with bank's money. The remedy of rescission is an equitable remedy. (b) 50,000 to be used to pay outstanding interest payments on the account of Mr M Nadeem in our books., The remaining terms of the facility letter made it clear that the outstanding balances of the loan were to be repayable forthwith on demand and that , The security for the loan will consist of a first legal charge over a [new] lease .. over [the property].. The new lease was to be for a term of 33 years from September 1990. PDF YS GM MARFIN II LLC & ORS v LAKHANI & ORS [2020] EWHC 2629 (Comm) CASE The town is named for Alleghany, Pennsylvania. Since its founding in 1910, DUNBAR is proof that authentic design expressed with craft is an honest guide through time. The bank would be affected if the circumstances were such that it would be taken to have notice of the wife's equity to set aside the transaction. Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltdwas approved by the House of Lords in Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd [1996] 4 All ER 769. . Dunbar provides solutions for publicly traded companies . It seems to me to follow from this analysis that the obligation of the Wife to make restitution as a condition for the setting aside of the legal charge is to restore to the Husband, if she can, the beneficial interest in the lease she acquired in consequence of the transactions as a whole. The properties which he owned had been acquired with the assistance of bank borrowings, both from the Bank and other secured lenders, and the onset of the recession was causing the value of their security to diminish. There was no coercion, pressure or deliberate concealment by Mr Nadeem in relation to his wife. Arguably, this may pertain to be evidence of equitys unequal treatment of the sexes. While there are some recent and welcome signs of legal engagement with the problems of masculinity, the solutions to womens problems lie largely outside law, in womens greater financial independence and a realignment of the relationship between men and women. Copyright 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. Nonetheless the defendant lost her case as the bank claimed it in no way intended to enforce the all-moneys clause, hence the transaction was not to her manifest disadvantage. Subscribers can access the reported version of this case. As a result the bank required the wife's signature to the relevant documentation. The Judge found that what was intended was bridging finance to help Mr Nadeem to make a profit by acquiring a valuable asset. By leveraging our expertise, our clients gain . I would allow the appeal of the Bank but dismiss the appeal of the Wife. In this action the plaintiff bank, Dunbar Bank plc ("the bank"), seeks to enforce as against both defendants a charge by way of legal mortgage dated 9 May 1991 over their joint leasehold interest in a house at 152 Pavilion Road, London SW1. v. Buckleton [1912] UKHL 642 (11 November 1912), Society of Solicitors, Edinburgh v Mathew Smillie and Others, Atari Corp (UK) Ltd v Electronics Boutique Stores (UK) [1997] EWCA Civ 2099 (15th July, 1997). In a numerous reported cases, the Court accepted that the principal debtors UI had occurred and their attention then turned to whether it affected the transaction with the lender. The claimant owned a house next to the defendant who was a housing developer. It's 08:21 in Alleghany, USA right now. In 1991 the bank made a further loan to the husband: 210,000 to purchase an extended lease and 50,000 to pay outstanding interest payments. In the financial climate of today, society now views this transaction as well documented and common place, it is normal. Matrimonial home husband obtaining bank loan to purchase lease matrimonial home charged to secure loan property also charged to secure husband's personal borrowings from bank wife seeking to have charge set aside on ground of undue influence by husband whether bank had constructive notice of undue influence. The requirement of manifest disadvantage has often been applied by judges whom fuse together the interests of both the husband and wife. However even this has been reported to be ignored. It was addressed to Mr and Mrs Nadeem and was in the following terms: (a) 210,000 to enable you to purchase a 32 years lease over [the property] for 210,000. Before the end of 1991, however, Mr Nadeem informed the Bank that Mrs Nadeem was to acquire the new lease jointly with himself. Since 1994, one third of all primary home buyers in the US market have been women with a similar figure predicted here. Mr Nadeem has for some time been heavily insolvent and towards the end of 1993 entered into a voluntary arrangement with his creditors under the Insolvency Act 1986. They have lived there since 1982. At most, she would have understood that the document was something to do with the house.. and the wife. The first is that 50,000 of the joint loan facility of 260,000 was to be applied by the Bank to meet Mr Nadeems own indebtedness to the Bank. As such, it was held whether the solicitors advice to her was competent or independent was an irrelevant consideration as she would have entered into the charge whatever [the solicitor] had said because she believed in her husbands ability to make a success of the new business. The Judges order must be set aside and an order substituting an order for possession must be substituted. Slade LJ said: Ever since the judgments of this court in Allcard v Skinner a . In Dunbar Bank Plc v. Nadeem [1998] the bank incorrectly used an all-moneys form instead of a limited one. Second, and pursuant to the first agreement or arrangement, there was the agreement for the loan and the security made between the Husband and Wife on the one hand and the Bank on the other contained in the facility letter and the legal charge. ; Public Service Employees Credit Union Co-op Ltd v Campion (1984) 75 FLR 131, 138. One might note her lack of economic analysis as palpable, thus letting down some of the other observant criticisms she does make. Rescission as a Self-Help Remedy: A Critical Analysis She did not read the letter before signing and, if she had read it, she would not have understood it. On 6th March 1991 Mr Nadeem returned the copy of the facility letter duly signed by himself and Mrs Nadeem. There was no possibility of her applying the advance except for the purpose of acquiring the property so that she could join in giving security to the Bank for the money advanced with which to acquire it. In Etridge Lord Hobhouse criticised the prevalence of forms favourable to the bank and excessively onerous to the surety. Seen through his eyes, the transaction was obviously beneficial to his wife and was intended by him to be for her benefit. Arguments stating women are incapable, even after receiving independent legal advice, of taking a binding decision are highly doubtable. Held: Unless the claimant could offer counter-restitution, the remedy of . Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, Lincolnshire County Council v Safeway Stores Plc: Admn 19 Apr 1999, Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Aboody, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999.